There have been some famous battle cries in history, like “Remember The Maine” from the Spanish‑American War. World War I was “The War to End All Wars.” We’ve all heard “Remember the Alamo.” Then, there are some famous ones from sports: “It ain’t over till the fat lady sings.” Yogi Berra translated that one this way: “It ain’t over till it’s over!” Then, of course, there is Henny Youngman’s battle cry: “Take my wife, please!”
Today is Reformation Sunday, commemorating the Protestant Reformation of the church. It was in 1517 on Oct. 31 that a young monk named Martin Luther nailed a list of questions up on his church’s front door, “the 95 theses” as they are called, that signaled the beginning of the Reformation. It had a three-part battle cry: “Faith Alone, Scripture Alone, and the Priesthood of Believers.” This battle cry has largely shaped church development since then and it has also influenced political developments.
To understand the significance of this battle cry, it is necessary to look at the church of Luther’s day – which should not be confused with the Roman Catholic Church of today! It was a very different church in the middle ages. In Luther’s day, the people believed that you worked your way up the ladder to heaven. Each time you took communion, merits were credited to your account. Baptism also earned you credits. But you also had debits to your account which were acts of sin. Your salvation depended upon your earning enough credits to offset your debts. In case you still remained “in the red,” you could turn to the saints who were supposed to have lived such a meritorious life that they had more than enough merits for their own salvation, so their excess merits could be credited to your account. If you reckoned that you or a loved one were heading for purgatory, which was believed to be a place the not-quite good enough went to be purged of sins so that they could finally one day ascend into heaven, then you could buy an “indulgence” and, in exchange for that indulgence, the pope would release the person from purgatory. An indulgence salesman of that day named Tetzel had his own battle‑cry which said, “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs.” As you can imagine, this practice led to much corruption, and whatever the Pope said was the infallible pronouncement of God.
Jesus spoke these words to the leaders of the religious institution of His day, but His words could well have been applied to the Medieval Church of Luther’s day: “And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them.” The church in the Middle Ages loaded people’s back with guilt and then offered a faulty remedy for this guilt, not really lifting one finger to help them.
Martin Luther was born into this faith system. Having been nearly struck by lightning, Luther had resolved to follow the noblest and most certain path, but the prescribed path did not bring him any assurance of forgiveness and eternal life. “My situation was that, although an impeccable monk, I stood before God as a sinner troubled in conscience, and I had no confidence that my merit would assuage him.” Luther began to wonder if God were just and righteous at all. Perhaps He was an untrustworthy tyrant, Luther thought. Then Luther began a study of the Book of Romans. There he saw the truth. Salvation was not earned by merits or saints or indulgences. Salvation had been won by Christ’s death, and it was received into our lives by faith and faith alone. “…Through grace and sheer mercy God justifies us through faith,” Luther wrote.
“Salvation by grace through faith alone” revolutionized and reformed first Luther’s life and then the whole church. It reformed the understanding of the sacraments. Baptism didn’t magically remove guilt. It was nothing unless accompanied by faith of the parents or the believer. The Lord’s supper, which had degenerated into a magic show or an exercise for extra credits, was said by Luther to be worthless unless the recipients understood salvation by faith alone. It was Luther’s understanding of salvation by faith alone that converted a searching John Wesley in 1738 and gave rise to the Methodist movement. It was this understanding of being saved by trusting in Christ alone that revolutionized my life and propelled me into the ministry. It is so simple that people find it hard to believe. It is so simple that people have to complicate it! And yet this is the simple truth: we are saved, not by our own goodness or good works but by the work of Christ on His cross. Our part is to accept this as true ‑ to believe.
Becoming a parent helped me to better understand this. It seems to be true that children doubt that their parents really love them. But we parents know the truth that we love our children, not because of how good they are, but because they are our children. That is how our heavenly Father feels about us! That is what salvation by faith means! We sing this belief in the hymn My Hope is Built:
My hope is built on nothing less than Jesus blood and righteousness.
I dare not trust the sweetest frame but wholly lean on Jesus’ name.
Since a study of scripture had led Luther to faith, and since the Protestant message was in conflict with the official Church’s teaching, it was natural that Protestants would look for a source of authority other than Popes. Luther did not trust the authority of popes or church councils because both had contradicted themselves many times. When pushed into a corner, Luther found himself standing on the scriptures as the authoritative source of truth and doctrine. He said that he would not act contrary to his conscience which was captive to the Word of God. “I cannot do otherwise,” he added. “Here I stand, so help me God.” In so doing, he went against the claims and practices of the church for 1000 years. People, even popes and councils, could be wrong. “People are like grass but God’s Word is eternal,” Isaiah said. By the way, it was this same distrust of people that led to the development of democracy. The same forces that led to the reformation of the church also led to the reformation of governments.
To say that the scripture is our authority is to say that we won’t swallow any doctrine that is not well documented in the Bible and that we make Christ, whom the scripture reveals, our authority. There is a fierce battle raging today over this issue ‑ the authority of scripture. At issue is why the Bible is our authority. Is the Bible our authority because it is “infallible”‑ without discrepancies or contradictions ‑ or is it authoritative because it is the only source of truth concerning Christ and the way of salvation? Those who want an infallible Bible seem to think that if the Bible can be shown to be without error, then God’s existence and Jesus’ resurrection are somehow proven. They seem to be saying that God’s existence and Christ’s resurrection depend upon whether or not the Bible is without error. In my opinion, they have the “cart before the horse.” The starting place for Christians is to have faith in God and this faith makes the Bible authoritative. The Bible’s place in my life depends ‑ not upon a doctrine of infallibility ‑ but rather upon my faith in God. If God is my authority, then His words are important. For Protestant, United Methodist people, the Bible is our authority because it tells us about the living Word of God, Jesus. And Methodists have four guides to help them interpret scriptures: 1) tradition ‑ how Christians before us have understood it; 2) The place of a passage in the context of the entire Bible message, centered in the gospel message; 3) What was the original intention of the writer, and how did the original hearers understand it; and 4) What does the passage mean to us in light of our circumstances today. The Protestant emphasis on scripture as the sole authority led to the rejection of all church sacraments except two, baptism and the Lord’s supper which were observed by Christ.
The idea of the priesthood of all believers means that ordained clergy and lay people stand as equals before God. Clergy‑persons are not higher, just different. I have heard it said that there were three kinds of people: men, women, and preachers. Clergy are only lay people with special training who have been given certain tasks to perform. Paul Tillich in A History of Christian Thought said “Every Christian is a priest, and thus has potentially the office of preaching the Word and administering the sacraments… For the sake of order, however, some specially fit personalities shall be called by the congregation to fill the offices of the church. The ministry is a matter of order. It is a vocation like all other vocations; it does not involve any state of perfection, superior graces, or anything like that.” James Kennedy, who was for many years the pastor of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, said that the devil’s greatest victory is getting lay people to believe that only preachers are responsible for ministry. The doctrine of the priesthood of believers means that each of us is the other one’s priest or pastor. We each are ministers to the other. Since 1964, every major denomination has been in decline. This includes Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and United Methodists. Now the Southern Baptists are also declining in membership. Many theories have been advanced as to why. Usually a theory gives someone a chance to blame someone else. As a pastor, I am willing to admit that we pastors deserve our share of the blame. Some say that the church has grown too conservative while others say too liberal. Some say that we are too stiff and formal; others say that we are too informal. But some churches are growing. Why? Here is my theory, and it involves the priesthood of believers. In these growing churches, the preaching is not as good as United Methodist preaching, although the delivery is more enthusiastic than ours. The music isn’t as good as ours. The organization isn’t nearly as good as ours. Their Sunday Schools are no better. But, having known some of these folks, I know that they take seriously their call to be priests to each other. They pray audibly for each other. We seem to think that only the preacher should pray! They counsel with each other. They shepherd each other. They lovingly hold one another accountable for faithful living. They meet in small Bible studies and sharing groups where they can confess their problems to each other. They openly share their pain and joys with each other. They accept anybody, regardless of race or how fouled up a person might be. They know how to love the unlovable. They see people changed by the love of Jesus. They do a better job being priests to one another!
Someone has said that Pentecostals find a person in the gutter, and they get him out. The Baptists cleanse them in water. The Methodists educate him. The Presbyterians help him get a job. The Episcopalians introduce him to high society living. Then the Pentecostals get him out of the gutter again…
I ask you, my friends, to think of people that might come through our doors to worship with us. Would a drug addict or a juvenile delinquent be welcomed here today? What about an Indian family, or Hispanic, or African-American? Are some churches growing because the priests – the preachers and members ‑ know how to accept folks better than we do? Why is it that only middle and upper economic persons are attracted to our United Methodist churches? Is it because those are the only folks we know how to love? The priesthood of believers is perhaps the greatest lesson from the reformation that we Protestants are yet to learn.
The Protestant Battle Cry: “By faith alone, the Bible alone, and the priesthood of believers,” a message 491 years old this week and still so fresh that it needs repeating almost daily! Amen.
Arthur H. Holt
Don't forget our monthly catered meal Wed., Sept. 1 from 5:30-7 p.m. in the Social Hall. Call June Melton at 877-0956 to RSVP!
Mark your calendars now for the annual United Methodist Mens Pancake Supper on Sept. 21 in the Family Life Center. Details soon.
Recent Comments